Article
(Press-release, Chelsea, New York City - Svetlana Vais, Art-critic)
ALL ABOUT MICHAEL
fall 2004
One of the mysteries of art lies in the impossibility to foretell
fashionable tendencies. All attempts to do so end up
in verbose treatises on the theory of composition, color schemes
or an accord between the form and the content. Nobody
has yet managed to derive a formula of success out of these
components. However, to examine and to describe the influence
of art on the individual, society and its culture in a certain
period of time proved to be possible. This does not work
in reverse, which, fortunately, bars the path to an easy success. It
is only through spiritual and physical labor, passion for
knowledge and experimen! tation, together with?natural talent,
that one could create a true work of art. And if such
a work sees the light of day, if it is a fruit of the fusion
of talent and soul, then this work of art will be claimed
ñ and it does not make any difference in what time
period and by what society. An artist can define the
time by moving in parallel with it, living according to the
laws of his own self-actualization. But the moment an
artist embarks on the path of divining or catching tendencies
of the public demand, he begets the works devoid of live and
spirit that can exert no influence on a viewer. They
neither attract nor repel. One passes them by without
notice.
Each painting of Michael Cheval leads its own individual existence. They
come to life in a mysterious and magical way, and, after leaving
their creator, they become viable entities that possess a
spiritual force and an ability to initiate a dialog as well
as to gather around itself groups of adherents or, conversely,
antagonists. This amazing phenomenon of a certain activity
of inanimate objects is, in fact, the true life of art.
Michael works in the style of surrealism that is the most
difficult for understanding and perception. He has always
worked in this style, regardless of time and place where he
lived or demands of the society around him, having personally
experienced an absolute lack of freedom of the totalitarian
system and opportunities of the free society. In spite
of the circumstances, the artist continued to work on the
infinitely profound subject of the surreal while creating
his own personal style.
By laws of surrealism, the image seen by an artist is not
processed by the mind, but rather directly transferred onto
canvas. The secret is that the artist saw what he could
see on the border of the intersecting time and space. Where
an ordinary person just sees an unhurried movement, an artist
is able to discern a deceleration of the flow of time. An
autumn landscape could be interpreted as a collapse of space
into a discrete segment of the season. The depiction
of timepieces ñ watches, hourglasses, or wall clocks
with a pendulum or a cuckoo ñ became s symbol of the
surrealists for several generations. Broken or tied cloc!
k hands, muddled numerals, melted clock-faces and hoarse-voice
cuckoos seemingly vary the flow of time by drawing into it
figurative objects and then distorting them, giving to them
a different meaning, deepening or reducing their significance. Such
an approach to a work of painting, cinema, music etc. totally
conforms to the Surrealist Manifesto. However, in the
course of several decades of its existence, this exceptionally
profound movement generated numerous new styles in art. In
their essence, they remain surrealist, fulfilling the chief
task of reflecting the consciousness, but they contribute
ñ now a greater psychological depth, now an irony,
now a posed question.
One of such styles is Psychological Absurdity, or, called
more literary, ìThe Theatre of the Absurdî, and
it is, in fact, the object of search of Michael Cheval. He
uses figurative objects as symbols ñ this principle
is derived from the basics, but, at the same time, the characters
are trying to solve a problem, which was set for them, proceeding
from an absurd situation in which the artist placed them. Into
one and the same action, he brings together people and animals,
domestic objects and exotic plants that cannot possibly come
next to each other in a life situation. Yet, the artist
experiments by placing them into the fabric of his absurd
play and tries to discern their influence on each other. At
that, the psychological charging of images is enormous. Therefore,
it is not surprising that the metamorphoses of trans-mutations
are one of the principal creative devices of the artist. At
times, that which is depicted on canvas breaks all the laws
of biology, chemistry and physics put together.
But, at the same time, the show thatís being performed
is perceived as a true drama, and a dialogue among inanimate
objects transforms into human relations and involves the viewer. And
all this results in a spiritual communion with the work of
art.
From the point of view of composition, the works of Michael
Cheval are quite complex. One could call them symphonic,
consisting of several tunes that are composed by individual
characters of the paintings. But, for all their complexity,
the compositions are always austere and balanced. They
have neither distortions nor collapses. In the process
of creating a painting, separate figurative images can change,
transform, dress up and altogether disappear, obeying a sudden
inner expression of the artist, but the main composition remains
the pivot. Such an approach testifies to a high degree
of professionalism, mastership as and, most importantly, certainty
in the need for a spiritual revelation.
The artist works in the technique of the Old Masters following
the entire technology of painting with oil on canvas. Multiple
layers achieve the depth of color. The effect of contrast
is frequently employed. The color scheme is rather bright,
but there is no exploitation of the pure colors. In certain
works, the artist creates a texture in order to intensify
some visual color effect, but, for the most part, his technique
could be defined as a ìsmooth-paintingî totally
devoid of the heavy impasto. The artistic vision and
mastership allow him to use such difficult for combination
colors as, for instance, red and blue. Each of these
colors is so profound and capable of conveying an intense
psychological charge that their combination in the same composition
should, in theory, emphasize two equipollent things, but they
could also destroy one another in inept hands. In the
paintings of Michael Cheval, the color charging of the objects
is distributed precisely in accordance with the artistís
conception and obeying the laws of harmony.
|